Hamlet As An Aristotelian Tragedy Essay -- essays research papers

According to the Aristotelian view of tragedy, a tragic hero must fall through his or her own error. This is typically called the "tragic flaw", and can be applied to any characteristic that causes the downfall the hero. Shakespeare's Hamlet, Prince of Denmark can be seen as an Aristotelian tragedy and Hamlet as it's tragic hero. Hamlet's flaw, which in accordance with Aristotle's principles of tragedy causes his demise, is his inability to act. This defect of Hamlet's character is displayed throughout the play. In the opening scenes of the play, the Ghost of old Hamlet reveals the truth about his death to his son, and tells Hamlet to avenge the murder. Hamlet's first response is one that sounds of speedy action, saying "Haste me to know't that I with winds as swift†¦ May sweep to my revenge." (p. 34 lines 29-31) Unfortunately, Hamlet's inability to act on his father's extortion has him reluctant to kill King Claudius by the end of that very scene, when he says, "This time is out of joint, O cursed spite, that I was ever born to set it right." (p. 41 lines 190-191) As the play goes on, Hamlet still has yet to act on his murderous task. In act II, scene 2, Hamlet decides that, before he can avenge his father's death, he must make sure that the Ghost was telling the truth. This simply gives Hamlet more excuse to procrastinate-he gets to put off killing Claudius until after the "play within a play", Mousetrap, is preformed. Not surprisin...

Rape of nanking outline

The Rape of Nanking was a mass murder and war rape the all occurred in the period of six weeks. The Japanese e saw themselves as the superior race compared to the Chinese. There were approve intimately 500,000 people living in Nan king when the Japanese attacked. Over 300,000 CIA villains were killed by the Japanese in brutal ways that even the Nazis living in Anion g at the time were horrified.The Japanese had a long standing contempt for the Chine SE as a people. Being an island nation in the shadow of the much larger China for so much of its history bred a healthy balance offer and nationalism. The Rape of Nanking occurred in just a few weeks late in 1937 to early 1938. When people are asked to describe the Nanking Massacre the most co moon response is â€Å"six weeks of hell. † The Japanese army began to zero in on Nanjing The the the official dates of the war were December 9 , 1937 and lasted tell January 17 1938.The Japanese believed they were superior to all races. Ther efore what atrocity they committed in Nanking were justified to them. The direct cause was the impanel Army took Nanking and wanted to â€Å"celebrate† by raping and murdering thus ands of civilians. During which an estimated 300,000 Chinese soldiers and civilians we re killed, and 20,000 women were raped. The Japanese had troops pushing down from the north while a troop was way ting for them down south. Inside Nanjing was about 70,000 troops and a quarter lion civilians.The troops would begin bringing their own trucks through the city an d not long after that the troops were seen loading people into the trucks by dozens. Nevertheless, most of the Japanese have remembered what happened to the Asian nations including to the people in Nanjing, and the Japanese has lived as a pep useful nation, from the reflection to the war. Being an island nation in the shadow of the much larger for so much of its history bred a healthy balance of fear and nationalism.

Should the United Kingdom Adopt a Written Constitution - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 9 Words: 2635 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Argumentative essay Level High school Did you like this example? ESSAY QUESTION: SHOULD THE UK ADOPT A WRITTEN CONSTITUTION? First of all, In order to full explain if the UK should adopt a written constitution we need to define the meaning of a constitution. Duhaime.org defines a constitution à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“as the basic fundamental law of a state which sets at how that state will be organized and the powers and authorities of government between different political units and citizens.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  Macmillianditionary.com goes on to define a constitution à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“as a set of basic laws or principles for a country that describe the rights and duties of its citizens and the way in which it is governedà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . I personally define a constitution as the body of rules set in place in order for that particular society to follow and it also guides that society. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Should the United Kingdom Adopt a Written Constitution?" essay for you Create order Now, we need to know how many types of constitution there is. There are three main types of the constitution which are: The written constitution. The unwritten constitution. Flexible/Rigid constitution. Basically, we will be focusing on just two types of the constitution which is the Written Unwritten constitutions. For us to fully grasp this question we need to know what a written and unwritten constitution are: WRITTEN UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTION Before we go any further, we need to know what a written and an unwritten actually are; Written constitution: I would define a written constitution as the body of rules is written and can also be found in one single document. Politics.co.uk defines the written constitution à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“as a formal document which defines the nature of the constitutional settlement, the rules that govern the political system and the rights of citizens and government in a codified formà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . Examples of countries that use a written constitution: USA Argentina Nigeria Advantages of a written constitution: It is easily accessible The references of a written constitution can be made for the written document and any breach of the principles that are contained in the written constitution will obviously become unconstitutional. It can control the arbitrary rule in a way that it checks on the authority of the head of state so that he would not be able to abuse his authority. It consists of all the basic laws as well as the concepts will all be in one single document. Disadvantages of a written constitution: Cannot be easily amended Sometimes in an autocratic state, the leaders try and change some of the laws that are in the written constitution, in order for it to suit their personal needs. In a country where the written constitution is used, the constitution is supreme. It is also a rigid type of constitution Unwritten constitution: Many people assume that when a country has an unwritten constitution it necessarily means that their constitution is literally not written down. However, that is not the case the fact that it is called à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"an unwritten constitutionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢, does not mean that their constitution is not written down it just means that it cannot be found in on document like the written constitution but is found in various documents. Merriam- Webster.com it defines an unwritten constitution as à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“not being embodied in a single document but based chiefly on custom and precedent as expressed in statutes and judicial decisions.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  Examples of countries that use an unwritten constitution: Israel New Zealand UK Advantages of an unwritten constitution: It is also a flexible constitution, meaning that it can be easily amended. An unwritten constitution reshapes. So that it can showcase the times we live in. There is supremacy of parliament. Unlike many countries that use a written constitution, states that use amending an unwritten constitution is way simpler. It is a simple procedure to change the constitution Disadvantages of an unwritten constitution: There is a lot of uncertainty within the constitution itself. All though the unwritten constitution is very flexible. Political issues can occur that can make the process harder or much more difficult. It is not easily accessible. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WRITTEN CONSTITUTION UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTION The main difference between an unwritten and a written constitution is that a written constitution it can be found in one legal document which is usually enacted in the form of laws. A written constitution is very clear- cut, definite as well as systematic. A written constitution is actually the product that was born from the hard work of the people of that country/state. Basically, this type of constitution is made by a governmental group that is first of all elected into office by the general public of that society/country at a point in time in history. A country that has a written constitution, usually the constitution in that country is usually supreme because most of the laws that are used to guide that country/society is actually derived from the constitution. Also stated earlier, A written constitution is rigid, which means that the procedure to amend if there is anything to amend if there is any situation to do so it is a difficult one. Usually most written constitutions donà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t really go through a process of change which can mean that most of the laws that derive from there are archaic or it isnà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t necessary for this time and age. For example, the constitution of India was created in the year 1950 so some of the laws that were made then cannot identify with the society change of 2015 and it cannot be changed because the constitution is a rigid one. As for an unwritten constitution, is the type of constitution that most of the governmentsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ concepts usually are not enforced into law or enforced that is made into an actual law or a body of laws. Usually an unwritten constitution comprises of customs, conventions, traditions and very few written laws that are actually dated. Unlike the written constitution, the unwritten constitution is unsystematic, not precise, not clear- cut. Basically it is the exact opposite of the written constitutio n. We know that for a written constitution that it is derived from the hard work of the people which most of the time they have no knowledge of this. However, an unwritten constitution actually derives from the conscious hard work of the people of that particular society. Which can mean that the effort that was put there was not really a whole hearted one. An unwritten constitution is not derived from any historical development or event, neither is it created by a governmental group e.g.: Constituent assembly at a certain point in history. Because of this, unlike a written constitution that can be called an enacted constitution. An unwritten constitution is usually called a cumulative constitution. A classic example of an unwritten constitution is the UK constitution which is our main topic of discussion. Also unlike the written constitution, an unwritten constitution is a flexible constitution ità ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s a flexible constitution which simply means that it can be easily am ended or even changed. The unwritten constitution is actually a time- friendly constitution meaning that unlike the written constitution that most of the laws that were made at that particular time in history e.g.: the Indian constitution that was created in 1950, most of the laws that are there are still being used now. This sometimes makes it difficult and confusing for the society of 2015 to comprehend. The unwritten constitution is a different case, due to the fact that that it is flexible which makes the amendment procedure quite simple. Most of the laws are changed during time and it agrees with that particular society at that point in time which makes it easy to comprehend. In a country that makes use of an unwritten constitution, the constitution is not supreme rather most of the countries that practice this constitution has a parliamentary government system which makes the parliament sovereign. Should the UK adopt a written constitution? We need to see both sides in o rder to decide which constitution will be suitable for the UK government. Advantages of the UK still having an unwritten constitution: First of all, we know that the UK constitution is an unwritten constitution. There are many sources that make up the UK constitution some can be: conventions, court rulings, statutes, common law, European laws, treaties etc. So even though the UK would want to adopt a written constitution it would be a very difficult procedure to begin with. Apart from this the Magna Carta (Which is the name of Britainà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s constitution) has a lot of historical history attached to it as well as major historic and political events that is recorded within this constitution, the Magna carta 1215[1] is basically the symbol of successful years of democracy as well as a symbol of unity between all the countries that make the united kingdom. In a written constitution we know that it is also a rigid constitution and whatever is stated down will be there f or years to come but with the uk constitution is a flexible constitution therefore making the procedure of amendment or changing the laws entirely easier than that of a country with a written constitution. Also a written constitution is usually created when there is either a government takeover or when that particular country is founded. Based on the fact that the UK is a very old country this can be difficult to automatically change from unwritten to written. Disadvantages of the UK having an unwritten constitution: The main disadvantage of the unwritten constitution of the UK is the fact that there is parliament supremacy. This literally means that whatever the parliament makes into law is final and nobody can repeal or contest this. So the problem here is that, the parliament can make anything they want to be made into law. This means that they can make discriminatory laws or autocratic laws and there is nothing the government or anyone can do about it. An example can be: T he US constitution 13th amendment[2] which states that: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“No law can be passed that allows slavery as it is therefore unconstitutionalà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . Even though it is difficult to amend a law in the US constitution is a form of a higher level of authority. Since this is not the case in the UK where the parliament is supreme and whatever laws that are made by parliament are permanent which can make it easy for the parliament to make slavery legal and nothing can stop this from happening. All though this cannot occur since slavery has been abolished and is not legal in the UK, but because of parliament sovereignty there would not be anything stopping them from doing so. Another example of parliament supremacy was when parliament decided to exempt them from the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012[3]. This act was to protect the confidentiality of the correspondence of the parliament and its constituents. Advantage of the written constitution in UK: Stated above we can determine what the advantage of the UK adopting a written constitution is that it will make the laws standard, it will make it clear for citizens to know their rights and their liberties. Apart from that in many countries that use the written constitution, the constitution is supreme which means just like the example of the 13th amendment of the US constitution which stated that no laws that enabled slavery would be allowed if it is, then this would be unconstitutional. Hence making it every law standard and since it is difficult to amend a written constitution it cannot be changed based anybody or governmental bodies whim. Also with the adoption of the written constitution in the UK it can eradicate the use of the monarchy in the UK. Disadvantages of the written constitution: Even though, that the written constitution looks more suitable for the UK to adopt this. However, if it does so there would be things that would not be agreeable or acceptable Such as discrimination. An example of a country that has had discrimination written in its constitution is: The New Hungarian Constitution which was enforced in 2012[4]: Article M. Section 1- Basic stipulation: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Hungary protects the institution of marriage between man and woman, a matrimonial relationship voluntary established, as well as the family as the basis for the survival of the nationà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . This is basically saying that it does not recognize same-sex marriages this is highly discriminatory and un- called for. Another example of this discrimination and also Religious bias in this constitution can be found in: Article 11[5]- Freedom and responsibility says that- à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Human dignity is inviolable. Everyone has the right to life and human dignity; the life of a fetus will be protected from conceptionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . This also banned abortion and preventing anyone who believes in this to either have a choice and it does not matter how this was conceived. And it also prev ents them from doing whatever they want with their own body. Also we know that Hungary is a Christian nation so therefore we have seen through its constitution that it is possible for a written constitution to have room discrimination and religious bias. This can occur in the UK if a written constitution is adopted, because we know that the Church of England is still the established church of the United Kingdom and they are also represented in parliament as a member of the House of Lords to be exact. All though, it is highly unlikely that the UK can establish law that contain discrimination and religious bias but it is a major maybe that it can occur. Conclusion: Personally, I believe that even though there are a lot of advantages that would makes a written constitution beneficial for the UK, The disadvantages which some is stated above outweigh the advantages. All though an unwritten constitution also has its major issue and problems the major one being: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Parlia ment supremacyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. The following facts summarize my personal view on why I think a written constitution should be adopted: For the fact that only three countries still have the unwritten constitution; Israel, UK and New Zealand. Shows that the written constitution is much more authentic. Another is Parliament supremacy since we know from what is stated above, that the parliament has the right to either make or unmake any law they please and nothing can be done about it. This means that they can decide to make laws that infringe on our fundamentals rights and freedoms. This that The Human Rights Act 1998[6] that was incorporated into laws can be affected as well as The European Communities Act 1972[7] which can affect these laws that show the supremacy of the community. And this can affect the laws that show the supremacy of community laws. Parliamentary supremacy can also be shown in this case: Where parliament tried to introduce The Asylum and Immigration Act Bill 2002 and this also had an ouster clause but due to parliamentary supremacy judicial review was removed from reviewing the failed asylum applicants. We know that due to the Constitutional Reform Act 2005[8] this made a lot of key changes in the structure of the UK constitution which means that we can adopt other acts and reforms that can push the UK on the path of a written constitution. BIBLIOGRAPHY à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Definition of a constitutionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. 2015 (Online), www.duhaime.org (29th May 2015). à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Definition of a constitution. 2015 (Online) www.macmillandictionary.com . (29th May 2015) à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Sources of typeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s constitutionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. 2015 (Online) www.answers.com (29th May 2015). à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Difference between a written and constitutionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. 2015 (Online), www.preservearticles.com (29th May 2015) à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Difference between written unwritten constitutionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. 2015 (Online), www.academia.edu (29th May 2015) à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Personal view sourcesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. 2015 (Online) www.thewilberforcesociety.co.uk (5thJune 2015). [1] Magna carta 1215 constitution of the Uk. [2] The USA constitution (The bill of rights). [3] See the protection of freedom act 2012. [4] See article M, S(1) of New Hungarian constitution [5] Article 11 of New Hungarian constitution [6] The Human Rights Act 1998 [7] The asylum and immigration Act (bill) 2002 [8]Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Should the United Kingdom Adopt a Written Constitution - Free Essay Example Sample details Pages: 9 Words: 2635 Downloads: 5 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Argumentative essay Level High school Did you like this example? ESSAY QUESTION: SHOULD THE UK ADOPT A WRITTEN CONSTITUTION? First of all, In order to full explain if the UK should adopt a written constitution we need to define the meaning of a constitution. Duhaime.org defines a constitution à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“as the basic fundamental law of a state which sets at how that state will be organized and the powers and authorities of government between different political units and citizens.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  Macmillianditionary.com goes on to define a constitution à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“as a set of basic laws or principles for a country that describe the rights and duties of its citizens and the way in which it is governedà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . I personally define a constitution as the body of rules set in place in order for that particular society to follow and it also guides that society. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Should the United Kingdom Adopt a Written Constitution?" essay for you Create order Now, we need to know how many types of constitution there is. There are three main types of the constitution which are: The written constitution. The unwritten constitution. Flexible/Rigid constitution. Basically, we will be focusing on just two types of the constitution which is the Written Unwritten constitutions. For us to fully grasp this question we need to know what a written and unwritten constitution are: WRITTEN UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTION Before we go any further, we need to know what a written and an unwritten actually are; Written constitution: I would define a written constitution as the body of rules is written and can also be found in one single document. Politics.co.uk defines the written constitution à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“as a formal document which defines the nature of the constitutional settlement, the rules that govern the political system and the rights of citizens and government in a codified formà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . Examples of countries that use a written constitution: USA Argentina Nigeria Advantages of a written constitution: It is easily accessible The references of a written constitution can be made for the written document and any breach of the principles that are contained in the written constitution will obviously become unconstitutional. It can control the arbitrary rule in a way that it checks on the authority of the head of state so that he would not be able to abuse his authority. It consists of all the basic laws as well as the concepts will all be in one single document. Disadvantages of a written constitution: Cannot be easily amended Sometimes in an autocratic state, the leaders try and change some of the laws that are in the written constitution, in order for it to suit their personal needs. In a country where the written constitution is used, the constitution is supreme. It is also a rigid type of constitution Unwritten constitution: Many people assume that when a country has an unwritten constitution it necessarily means that their constitution is literally not written down. However, that is not the case the fact that it is called à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"an unwritten constitutionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢, does not mean that their constitution is not written down it just means that it cannot be found in on document like the written constitution but is found in various documents. Merriam- Webster.com it defines an unwritten constitution as à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“not being embodied in a single document but based chiefly on custom and precedent as expressed in statutes and judicial decisions.à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  Examples of countries that use an unwritten constitution: Israel New Zealand UK Advantages of an unwritten constitution: It is also a flexible constitution, meaning that it can be easily amended. An unwritten constitution reshapes. So that it can showcase the times we live in. There is supremacy of parliament. Unlike many countries that use a written constitution, states that use amending an unwritten constitution is way simpler. It is a simple procedure to change the constitution Disadvantages of an unwritten constitution: There is a lot of uncertainty within the constitution itself. All though the unwritten constitution is very flexible. Political issues can occur that can make the process harder or much more difficult. It is not easily accessible. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WRITTEN CONSTITUTION UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTION The main difference between an unwritten and a written constitution is that a written constitution it can be found in one legal document which is usually enacted in the form of laws. A written constitution is very clear- cut, definite as well as systematic. A written constitution is actually the product that was born from the hard work of the people of that country/state. Basically, this type of constitution is made by a governmental group that is first of all elected into office by the general public of that society/country at a point in time in history. A country that has a written constitution, usually the constitution in that country is usually supreme because most of the laws that are used to guide that country/society is actually derived from the constitution. Also stated earlier, A written constitution is rigid, which means that the procedure to amend if there is anything to amend if there is any situation to do so it is a difficult one. Usually most written constitutions donà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t really go through a process of change which can mean that most of the laws that derive from there are archaic or it isnà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t necessary for this time and age. For example, the constitution of India was created in the year 1950 so some of the laws that were made then cannot identify with the society change of 2015 and it cannot be changed because the constitution is a rigid one. As for an unwritten constitution, is the type of constitution that most of the governmentsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ concepts usually are not enforced into law or enforced that is made into an actual law or a body of laws. Usually an unwritten constitution comprises of customs, conventions, traditions and very few written laws that are actually dated. Unlike the written constitution, the unwritten constitution is unsystematic, not precise, not clear- cut. Basically it is the exact opposite of the written constitutio n. We know that for a written constitution that it is derived from the hard work of the people which most of the time they have no knowledge of this. However, an unwritten constitution actually derives from the conscious hard work of the people of that particular society. Which can mean that the effort that was put there was not really a whole hearted one. An unwritten constitution is not derived from any historical development or event, neither is it created by a governmental group e.g.: Constituent assembly at a certain point in history. Because of this, unlike a written constitution that can be called an enacted constitution. An unwritten constitution is usually called a cumulative constitution. A classic example of an unwritten constitution is the UK constitution which is our main topic of discussion. Also unlike the written constitution, an unwritten constitution is a flexible constitution ità ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s a flexible constitution which simply means that it can be easily am ended or even changed. The unwritten constitution is actually a time- friendly constitution meaning that unlike the written constitution that most of the laws that were made at that particular time in history e.g.: the Indian constitution that was created in 1950, most of the laws that are there are still being used now. This sometimes makes it difficult and confusing for the society of 2015 to comprehend. The unwritten constitution is a different case, due to the fact that that it is flexible which makes the amendment procedure quite simple. Most of the laws are changed during time and it agrees with that particular society at that point in time which makes it easy to comprehend. In a country that makes use of an unwritten constitution, the constitution is not supreme rather most of the countries that practice this constitution has a parliamentary government system which makes the parliament sovereign. Should the UK adopt a written constitution? We need to see both sides in o rder to decide which constitution will be suitable for the UK government. Advantages of the UK still having an unwritten constitution: First of all, we know that the UK constitution is an unwritten constitution. There are many sources that make up the UK constitution some can be: conventions, court rulings, statutes, common law, European laws, treaties etc. So even though the UK would want to adopt a written constitution it would be a very difficult procedure to begin with. Apart from this the Magna Carta (Which is the name of Britainà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s constitution) has a lot of historical history attached to it as well as major historic and political events that is recorded within this constitution, the Magna carta 1215[1] is basically the symbol of successful years of democracy as well as a symbol of unity between all the countries that make the united kingdom. In a written constitution we know that it is also a rigid constitution and whatever is stated down will be there f or years to come but with the uk constitution is a flexible constitution therefore making the procedure of amendment or changing the laws entirely easier than that of a country with a written constitution. Also a written constitution is usually created when there is either a government takeover or when that particular country is founded. Based on the fact that the UK is a very old country this can be difficult to automatically change from unwritten to written. Disadvantages of the UK having an unwritten constitution: The main disadvantage of the unwritten constitution of the UK is the fact that there is parliament supremacy. This literally means that whatever the parliament makes into law is final and nobody can repeal or contest this. So the problem here is that, the parliament can make anything they want to be made into law. This means that they can make discriminatory laws or autocratic laws and there is nothing the government or anyone can do about it. An example can be: T he US constitution 13th amendment[2] which states that: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“No law can be passed that allows slavery as it is therefore unconstitutionalà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . Even though it is difficult to amend a law in the US constitution is a form of a higher level of authority. Since this is not the case in the UK where the parliament is supreme and whatever laws that are made by parliament are permanent which can make it easy for the parliament to make slavery legal and nothing can stop this from happening. All though this cannot occur since slavery has been abolished and is not legal in the UK, but because of parliament sovereignty there would not be anything stopping them from doing so. Another example of parliament supremacy was when parliament decided to exempt them from the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012[3]. This act was to protect the confidentiality of the correspondence of the parliament and its constituents. Advantage of the written constitution in UK: Stated above we can determine what the advantage of the UK adopting a written constitution is that it will make the laws standard, it will make it clear for citizens to know their rights and their liberties. Apart from that in many countries that use the written constitution, the constitution is supreme which means just like the example of the 13th amendment of the US constitution which stated that no laws that enabled slavery would be allowed if it is, then this would be unconstitutional. Hence making it every law standard and since it is difficult to amend a written constitution it cannot be changed based anybody or governmental bodies whim. Also with the adoption of the written constitution in the UK it can eradicate the use of the monarchy in the UK. Disadvantages of the written constitution: Even though, that the written constitution looks more suitable for the UK to adopt this. However, if it does so there would be things that would not be agreeable or acceptable Such as discrimination. An example of a country that has had discrimination written in its constitution is: The New Hungarian Constitution which was enforced in 2012[4]: Article M. Section 1- Basic stipulation: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Hungary protects the institution of marriage between man and woman, a matrimonial relationship voluntary established, as well as the family as the basis for the survival of the nationà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . This is basically saying that it does not recognize same-sex marriages this is highly discriminatory and un- called for. Another example of this discrimination and also Religious bias in this constitution can be found in: Article 11[5]- Freedom and responsibility says that- à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Human dignity is inviolable. Everyone has the right to life and human dignity; the life of a fetus will be protected from conceptionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . This also banned abortion and preventing anyone who believes in this to either have a choice and it does not matter how this was conceived. And it also prev ents them from doing whatever they want with their own body. Also we know that Hungary is a Christian nation so therefore we have seen through its constitution that it is possible for a written constitution to have room discrimination and religious bias. This can occur in the UK if a written constitution is adopted, because we know that the Church of England is still the established church of the United Kingdom and they are also represented in parliament as a member of the House of Lords to be exact. All though, it is highly unlikely that the UK can establish law that contain discrimination and religious bias but it is a major maybe that it can occur. Conclusion: Personally, I believe that even though there are a lot of advantages that would makes a written constitution beneficial for the UK, The disadvantages which some is stated above outweigh the advantages. All though an unwritten constitution also has its major issue and problems the major one being: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Parlia ment supremacyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. The following facts summarize my personal view on why I think a written constitution should be adopted: For the fact that only three countries still have the unwritten constitution; Israel, UK and New Zealand. Shows that the written constitution is much more authentic. Another is Parliament supremacy since we know from what is stated above, that the parliament has the right to either make or unmake any law they please and nothing can be done about it. This means that they can decide to make laws that infringe on our fundamentals rights and freedoms. This that The Human Rights Act 1998[6] that was incorporated into laws can be affected as well as The European Communities Act 1972[7] which can affect these laws that show the supremacy of the community. And this can affect the laws that show the supremacy of community laws. Parliamentary supremacy can also be shown in this case: Where parliament tried to introduce The Asylum and Immigration Act Bill 2002 and this also had an ouster clause but due to parliamentary supremacy judicial review was removed from reviewing the failed asylum applicants. We know that due to the Constitutional Reform Act 2005[8] this made a lot of key changes in the structure of the UK constitution which means that we can adopt other acts and reforms that can push the UK on the path of a written constitution. BIBLIOGRAPHY à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Definition of a constitutionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. 2015 (Online), www.duhaime.org (29th May 2015). à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Definition of a constitution. 2015 (Online) www.macmillandictionary.com . (29th May 2015) à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Sources of typeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s constitutionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. 2015 (Online) www.answers.com (29th May 2015). à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Difference between a written and constitutionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. 2015 (Online), www.preservearticles.com (29th May 2015) à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Difference between written unwritten constitutionà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. 2015 (Online), www.academia.edu (29th May 2015) à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Personal view sourcesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. 2015 (Online) www.thewilberforcesociety.co.uk (5thJune 2015). [1] Magna carta 1215 constitution of the Uk. [2] The USA constitution (The bill of rights). [3] See the protection of freedom act 2012. [4] See article M, S(1) of New Hungarian constitution [5] Article 11 of New Hungarian constitution [6] The Human Rights Act 1998 [7] The asylum and immigration Act (bill) 2002 [8]Constitutional Reform Act 2005.

Martin Van Buren Biography and Presidency

The Evil of Armenian Genocide Essay - 836 Words

In order for us to find the foundation of our human nature, we must look beyond into our early years where human nature is dug deep into the roots of our history and involvements. About 97 years ago the horrific Genocide of the Armenians took place. Turkey has shown a classic example of the evil that can result by human beings. Millions of Armenians were slaughtered and murdered in front of their family members. The destruction that constantly plays out throughout the world is cuased by human beings. Hsun Tzu would have also agreed that the young Turks were in face by nature extremely evil. April 24th is the day of grief for many Armenians. Almost every Armenian reminisces on their loved ones that they have lost during this†¦show more content†¦They had no clue where their families were or even if they were alive. Children were separated from their parents during the march to the concentration camps in the desert. The authorities loaded the Armenians like animals on boats an d sent them away. The massacre of the Armenian race went on for two long years. 1.5 million Armenians were brutalized and starved to death. Hsun Tzu is a Chinese philosopher whom believes human beings are by nature integrally evil, and the only way they will be able to be good is by their conscious activity. Humans learn from others and naturally follow without knowing if it is good or bad. After realizing how imperfect the nature of man is we understand as to why a man must become a student before he grows from his evil nature. It is true horror that mankind can conflict on society. Society has many rules and we humans always tend to follow them. The Turks followed their leaders which was the Young Turk Government in which led them to believe the Armenians were trying to take all of their land. This proves that Hsun Tzu is right about humans and society. Hsun Tzu said, â€Å"the progress of society would decay into barbarism, selfishness and violence.† This quote connects w ith the history of the Armenian Genocide and how evil the Turks were to the Armenians. Their leader told them to have the Armenians starve to death and they did. They thought what they were doing was totally right and for the best of their country. HsunShow MoreRelatedThree Examples of Genocide Essay772 Words   |  4 Pagesengage in acts without thinking; but it was the acts that were premeditated which were classified as evil and brutal. A. M. Rosenthal, the author of No News From Auschwitz, described a single moment in history where these kinds of acts were invoked. This appalling endeavor is known as genocide which is the deliberate destruction of a national, racial or a religious group (Winston Dictionary). Genocide is universal rather than limited to one time and one group of people. The Catholics in IrelandRead More##hetorical Analysis Of Elie Wiesels The Perils Of Indifference746 Words   |  3 Pagesthe only genocide to have taken place in history. Many more have occurred like the Armenian genocide, Cambodian genocide, and Rwandan genocide. A commonality between all genocides is the lack of timely assistance in stopping the massacre and as Wiesel would likely say this is due to indifference. In the case of the Armenian genocide the Americans, Russians, Germans, and Turks witnessed the atrocity, yet hardly did much to stop it. â€Å"It is estimated that one and a half million Armenians perished betweenRead MoreThe Rise of Discrimination Essay1143 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"Indifference, to me, is the epitome of evil† (Brainy Quotes). Wiesel being a survivor of arguably the worst genocide in history, knows first hand what its like to be discriminated against, and so do the victims of the Armenian genocide. The Armenian genocide brought pain and suffering to a group of people for the same reason it did to Elie Wiesel and the Jews; Discrimination. The Armenians are a group of people that originated from tribes in the Armenian highlands around 10,00 B.C (1). In the 4thRead MoreThe Hungarian Culture And The Armenian Culture1398 Words   |  6 Pagesis defined in many different ways for many different people. There are several languages, customs, education, beliefs, and so much more. The Armenian culture has many aspects. Some aspects that contribute to the Armenian culture is the history, religion, literature, war, agriculture, foods, lifestyle, and contributions. A brief Introduction to the Armenian culture goes back to historic times. The historic name of Armenia was â€Å"Hayk† then later called â€Å"Hayastan†. The name came from the states thatRead MoreHuman Rights Within The World1313 Words   |  6 Pagesand a need for fairness. With this in mind, things such as human rights are dated back to violent history. Nazi Germany arguably sparked an interest in human rights as their â€Å"good triumphed through the acts of a selfless few or out of the depths of evil†. Human rights refer to the laws, acts and policies initiated in order to protect vulnerable, oppressed people in the world and allow them to possibly thrive in this world. Although women, sexual minorities, and racialized minorities all play a significantRead MoreThe Conflict Of The Rwandan Genocide1511 Words   |  7 PagesSometime in April 1994, during the Rwandan Genocide, Father Athanase Seromba helped lure 2,000 Tutsi men, women, and children into his c hurch where they thought they would be safe. One day, Seromba began clearing out the Communion chalices. A refugee in the church begged him to leave the Eucharist so that they could hold a final mass. However, Seromba refused, telling the congregation that the building was no longer a church. Another refugee asked the priest if he would pray for them. He answeredRead MoreThe Armenian Genocide2102 Words   |  9 PagesArmenian Genocide Andy Leeds Ms. Bullis English 1 April 24 Armenians are a Christian nation, and when they were a country, they were the first to proclaim Christianity as the state religion. The Ottoman Empire took control of Armenia during the 15th century, and they were mistreated for quite a while due to religious differences (Christians vs. Muslims), and this mistreatment culminated and peaked during 1915-1918. During World War I, the Ottoman Empire took the opportunity among a world of chaosRead MoreMy Great Grandmother s Diary2378 Words   |  10 Pageslearned that my great grandmother, Mari Hovhanness, was an Armenian living in the Ottoman Empire during the time of the Armenian Genocide of 1915. Born in 1888, Mari lived through the first bloody massacres in 1894 and again experienced the brutal attacks during the deportations in 1915-1917. She was married to the love of her life, Tavit Hovhaness, and had two children. Dying in November of 1915, the only member of the family to survive the genocide was Mari’s eldest son. Mari and her family suffered throughRead MoreHotel Rwanda By Terry George975 Words   |  4 PagesPossibly the saddest and most tragic event that occurred in the last few decades was the genocide of the Tutsi population in Rwanda by the Hutu led government and Hutu people of the same country. Hotel Rwanda by Terry George is a film adaption of the experiences of a Tutsi hotel manager Paul Rusesabagina who sheltered and kept safe several thousand Hutu refugees during the genocide. This film clearly portrays its major themes such as ethnic conflict, the lack of human rights, and many other socialRead MoreEssay about Darfurs Turning Point or Not1174 Words   |  5 PagesEvil can come in many different forms. Desmond Tutu claims this to be as he once said, â€Å"When people think of the sort of things that happen when genocide happens, its again not people who are intrinsically evil.† This quote by Desmond Tutu is a definition of evil because not everybody was born being evil it depe nds on a persons real nature. When many people think of evil they think of the people that they do not like or do not care for. Without people being evil are world would not be as it is today

Dolly Madison Essay Research Paper Dolly Payne free essay sample

Dolly Madison Essay, Research Paper Dolly Payne Madison was born in Guilford County, North Carolina on May 20, 1768. Dolly was born the first miss in a household of several kids to Quaker parents, John Payne and Mary Coles. She spent her childhood in Scotchtown, Virginia. # 8220 ; The Paynes were good connected and sufficiently comfortable, little plantation owners in Hanover County. # 8221 ; 1 The Quaker house forbade celebration, shunned amusement and frowned upon the universe # 8217 ; s amour propres. After a preliminary visit to Philadelphia, John Payne returned to Hanover County to dispose of his belongings and free his slaves and in July 1783 he settled with his household in the pleasant metropolis of Philadelphia. In Philadelphia Dolly brought comeliness and appeal to the Quaker Evening Meetings. In her head, nevertheless, there were other things in Philadelphia more engrossing than the modus operandi of meetings. Under her Quaker gown Dolly # 8217 ; s bosom yearned, honestly and without any shame, for these things. Yet, when her household told her to get married John Todd, she stood up dutifully at first and 2nd meeting and proclaimed her willingness to make so. His male parent was an high Quaker school teacher ; John was a outstanding immature attorney, 27 old ages old. She did non postulate against John Todd. # 8220 ; Dolly had the ability to accept whatever destiny might hold to offer and do the really best of it. # 8221 ; 2 They were married on January 7, 1790, at the Friends # 8217 ; Meeting House on Pine Street. In the summer of 1793 there came the xanthous pestilence. Dolly was fighting with her kids along the crowded route to Gray # 8217 ; s Ferry, one of the panic driven multitudes get awaying from the afflicted metropolis. John Todd stayed behind to give his able bodied and brave aid, and before the winter was over Dolly had lost her hubby and her babe. Dolly herself was urgently sick for she had caught the febrility from John when he came reeling out at last to Gray # 8217 ; s Ferry. She recovered to happen herself a widow at 25, and executrix of her hubby # 8217 ; s will. In the autumn Dolly returned to her female parent # 8217 ; s house, which was now a embarkation house. At all events, the Senator from New York, Colonel Aaron Burr, lodged at the Madison Lodging House. He told everyone about the pretty widow Todd. He eventually told his friend Congressman Madison of Virginia. The Congressman, nevertheless, disliked adult females after Catherine Floyd had ended their long battle. One twenty-four hours James Madison saw the widow drive by and began teasing Colonel Burr for an debut. In the spring of 1794 Dolly and James were introduced for the first clip. It was non long before their battle was rumored all over Philadelphia. John Todd had non been dead a twelvemonth when, on September 15, 1794, James and Dolly were married at Harewood. Now there was a new Philadelphia for Quaker Dolly, the Philadelphia she had ever longed for. # 8220 ; The town had neer been more cheery, a continually altering pageant of foreign invitees and ministers. # 8221 ; 3 A superb scene graced by the presence of many of the emigrated aristocracy of France. In her new function, as Mrs. Madison of Montpellier, Dolly plunged into these celebrations with all the stored-up gusto of her reticent maidenhood. For three old ages Dolly brought a fresh, bright personality to inspire Lady Washington # 8217 ; s slightly airless levees in the old brick house on Market Street. Dolly Madison adored the Washington # 8217 ; s. Dolly made friends in all cantonments for James Madison, which likely helped him win presidential term. He did non care for all the mobs and levees so he retired to his darling town of Montpellier, to his purdah and his books. On the forenoon of March 4, 1801 the Federalists were defeated, and Thomas Jefferson was to take his topographic point as President of the United States. Soon secretary of province Madison and his married woman were dragged off from Montpellier once more and came to shack in Washington. # 8220 ; Present me respectfully to Mrs. Madison, # 8221 ; Mr. Jefferson wrote, # 8220 ; and pray her to maintain you where you are, for her ain satisfaction and for the public good. # 8221 ; 4 Since Mr. Jefferson was fond of them both, and because he was a widowman, Mrs. Secretary of State Madison found herself presiding at the caput of the Executive board. For eight old ages, # 8220 ; Queen Dolly, # 8221 ; as they called her, ruled over the societal fates of the Executive Mansion in malice of the demands upon her strength and the humidness of the malarial fens, which crippled her with inflammatory rheumatism from which she suffered for the remainder of her life. In March, 1809, Mr. Jefferson retired, smiling to Monticello ; Mr. Madison necessarily became President, and Dolly moved into that Great House of which she had already been mistress so long. After Madison became president official maps became more luxuriant. The inaugural ceremonials were none the less superb and impressive. The President’s House became known as the â€Å"castle† in the Madison epoch. â€Å"Washington was coming into its ain, blessed with more attractive forces than any other topographic point in America.†5 Tuesday, August 23, 1814, Mrs. Secretary of the Navy Jones found it necessary to compose to Dolly that, # 8220 ; I am packing with the possibility of holding to go forth, for the British are near. # 8221 ; There was suppose to be a large dinner for all the Cabinet at the Madison # 8217 ; s but the British fleet was in the Chesapeake. British military personnels were processing through the forests to Washington and the Cabinet officers were with the President at General Winder # 8217 ; s cantonment. The British kept right on processing by the Bladensburg route which no 1 had thought to blockade, and alternatively of dining at Dolly # 8217 ; s, the Cabinet went streaming across the state to Bladensburg with the ground forces. On Wednesday, August 24, there was a conflict. An unfortunate conflict in which the base British fired projectiles at the amazed reserves, so that they departed in some confusion to their places. At Washington that afternoon there was uproar and blare in the streets. Dolly scanned the skyline with a field glass and saw nil to promote her. There was a dust of going household managers. Dolly is best known for her flight from Washington in 1814, when the British invaded the metropolis during the War of 1812. She saved many province documents and a portrayal of George Washington. At three O # 8217 ; time a courier came galloping up and told Dolly that she must go forth. For the 2nd clip in American history, the British were coming! At Dolly # 8217 ; s suggestion, # 8220 ; French # 8221 ; John Siousa and Magrau, the nurseryman, broke the frame incorporating Gilbert Stuart # 8217 ; s portrayal of Mr. Washington and gave the image to some gentlemen for safe maintaining. Dolly herself passed through the dining room, crammed some things into her reticule, and was so driven to Georgetown in her passenger car. The Castle was abandoned ; to be raided, foremost, by American strayers, and so to be burned by the British who conflagrated it after processing 50 crewmans and Mariness mutely through the avenue. Mrs. Smith wrote to Dolly, # 8220 ; How gloomy is the scene, I do non say Government will of all time return to Washington. # 8221 ; 6 The Castle was conflagrated, merely it # 8217 ; s blackened walls remained, and Dolly established herself in the Tayloe sign of the zodiac, the celebrated brick # 8220 ; Octagon. # 8221 ; On February 4, 1815, there was intelligence in the streets of triumph at New Orleans, and the name of President-to-be on every lingua. On February 13, Mr. Gallatin, Mr. Adams, Mr. Clay, Mr. Bayard, and Mr. Russell had made a pact. The whole town went to Mrs. Madison # 8217 ; s ; person was pealing a dinner bell. It was a cheery winter ; the # 8220 ; Peace Winter of 1815. # 8221 ; On March, 1817 Mr. Monroe won Presidency and the drama was done for Dolly. Now there was observing but Montpellier and the composure humdrum beauty of the Blue Ridge. Dolly was now 49. After the Castle and the Octagon, there was a quiet, somewhat dilapidated, colonnaded sign of the zodiac against a background of unchanging trees. Dolly was to pass the following 20 old ages, rather cheerfully and serenely in her native province. She still received a sequence of visitants. Then the roll uping old ages brought separation and sorrow, Mr. Monroe died in 1831, Dolly # 8217 ; s sister, Anna Cutt, in 1832, and at last, in 1836, Madison himself. Dolly was really ill afterwards, nevertheless, a visit to the White Sulphur in 1837 did her good. She found something to busy her in redaction and printing her hubby # 8217 ; s Reports of the Constitutional Congress. She was 69 now and for Dolly nil remained but the alone contemplation of melting scenes. Dolly returned to Washington in 1837 with her niece. It was a new Washington in many ways, but turned to her with respectful attending. Montpellier had to be sold because her boy, John Payne Todd, who neglected his female parent, was in debt. Washington, nevertheless, neer neglected Dolly, and frequently sent her baskets of fruit and commissariats. Congress did non bury Dolly either, and gave her a place on the floor of the House during her life-time. Congress besides paid for Mr. Madison # 8217 ; s Reports. # 8220 ; It was February 7 ; Dolly was at the stopping point of her 80th twelvemonth, she was in white satin with the inevitable turban-and on July 12 she died. # 8221 ; 7

How to Check the Verticality of High Rise Building free essay sample

How to check the verticality of High rise building? The plumb bob is the most commonly used tool for monitoring the verticality of a building under construction. Two plumb bobs at at the end of each face of a building, Extending up to a fixed height from the base of the tower, so that same reference points are used at all time, can give the best result. Using the plumb bob i could complete the construction of a 80m tall rectangular structure at a cement plant, within the specified tolerance of H/1000 with ease. Alternatively total station also can be used for monitoring the Northing Easting of the four corner of the building at each level. To achieve this four reference pillars / fixed station are to be established on the ground away from the tower, from where the corners of the building can be viewed thro the telescope of total station till the building reaches its total height. We will write a custom essay sample on How to Check the Verticality of High Rise Building? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page If it is possible to instal permanently, the laser plumb can be used for measuring the deviation. The tranmiter is to be fixed at the base and the target glass plate is to be attached to the moving form work permanently. This method is used in the construction of circular silos / Chimneys wherein the slip form method is used for raising the RCC tower. For the affordable GPS may handy with proper integration. I am yet to try this, no idea about limitation cost. I hope the above is of some use.